Economic growth is often seen as a goal in itself, but recent discussions highlight that health is both a prerequisite for growth and a measure of its success. Poor health limits workforce participation, reduces productivity, and strains public services, while decisions in housing, transport, employment, and urban regeneration directly shape long-term health outcomes. Ignoring the link between health and growth risks undermining both economic and social progress.
Evidence shows that local economic development interventions can improve health when designed intentionally. Many areas are already embedding health considerations into growth strategies, but scaling and sustaining these innovations requires supportive central government funding and policies.
Effective interventions work best when delivered as part of a coherent, system-wide approach rather than isolated projects. Examples from Greater Manchester, Havant, Torfaen, and Blaenau Gwent demonstrate that aligning services, adopting whole-system plans, and integrating prevention strategies benefit both health and the local economy. Formal frameworks and recognised programmes help attract partner buy-in, ensure resource alignment, and provide evidence to justify further investment.
Quantifying impact is essential for gaining support, especially in tight funding environments. Demonstrating the economic value of health-focused initiatives, such as youth support programmes, helps build a strong case for sustained investment. However, national funding structures often remain siloed, short-term, and focused on crisis management, limiting local flexibility to invest in preventative approaches. Place-based budgeting and longer-term funding settlements could better support integrated health and growth strategies.
Community involvement is critical to success and avoiding widening inequalities. Co-design with local residents and trusted community organisations ensures initiatives reach those most affected and are culturally relevant. Programs like Greater Manchester’s Live Well and The Salford Way embed co-design principles, while international examples, such as the Dutch District Approach, show the importance of long-term community engagement for sustainable health improvements.
Looking ahead, local areas need flexible, sustainable funding and alignment with broader public service and health plans. Health should be treated as a core outcome of growth, not a secondary benefit. By prioritising health in economic development strategies, local authorities can create meaningful, equitable benefits for residents while driving economic progress.
