• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

fundsforNGOs News

Grants and Resources for Sustainability

  • Subscribe for Free
  • Premium Support
  • Premium Login
  • Premium Sign up
  • Home
  • Funds for NGOs
    • Agriculture, Food and Nutrition
    • Animals and Wildlife
    • Arts and Culture
    • Children
    • Civil Society
    • Community Development
    • COVID
    • Democracy and Good Governance
    • Disability
    • Economic Development
    • Education
    • Employment and Labour
    • Environmental Conservation and Climate Change
    • Family Support
    • Healthcare
    • HIV and AIDS
    • Housing and Shelter
    • Humanitarian Relief
    • Human Rights
    • Human Service
    • Information Technology
    • LGBTQ
    • Livelihood Development
    • Media and Development
    • Narcotics, Drugs and Crime
    • Old Age Care
    • Peace and Conflict Resolution
    • Poverty Alleviation
    • Refugees, Migration and Asylum Seekers
    • Science and Technology
    • Sports and Development
    • Sustainable Development
    • Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)
    • Women and Gender
  • Funds for Companies
    • Accounts and Finance
    • Agriculture, Food and Nutrition
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Education
    • Energy
    • Environment and Climate Change
    • Healthcare
    • Innovation
    • Manufacturing
    • Media
    • Research Activities
    • Startups and Early-Stage
    • Sustainable Development
    • Technology
    • Travel and Tourism
    • Women
    • Youth
  • Funds for Individuals
    • All Individuals
    • Artists
    • Disabled Persons
    • LGBTQ Persons
    • PhD Holders
    • Researchers
    • Scientists
    • Students
    • Women
    • Writers
    • Youths
  • Funds in Your Country
    • Funds in Australia
    • Funds in Bangladesh
    • Funds in Belgium
    • Funds in Canada
    • Funds in Switzerland
    • Funds in Cameroon
    • Funds in Germany
    • Funds in the United Kingdom
    • Funds in Ghana
    • Funds in India
    • Funds in Kenya
    • Funds in Lebanon
    • Funds in Malawi
    • Funds in Nigeria
    • Funds in the Netherlands
    • Funds in Tanzania
    • Funds in Uganda
    • Funds in the United States
    • Funds within the United States
      • Funds for US Nonprofits
      • Funds for US Individuals
      • Funds for US Businesses
      • Funds for US Institutions
    • Funds in South Africa
    • Funds in Zambia
    • Funds in Zimbabwe
  • Proposal Writing
    • How to write a Proposal
    • Sample Proposals
      • Agriculture
      • Business & Entrepreneurship
      • Children
      • Climate Change & Diversity
      • Community Development
      • Democracy and Good Governance
      • Disability
      • Disaster & Humanitarian Relief
      • Environment
      • Education
      • Healthcare
      • Housing & Shelter
      • Human Rights
      • Information Technology
      • Livelihood Development
      • Narcotics, Drugs & Crime
      • Nutrition & Food Security
      • Poverty Alleviation
      • Sustainable Develoment
      • Refugee & Asylum Seekers
      • Rural Development
      • Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH)
      • Women and Gender
  • News
    • Q&A
  • Premium
    • Premium Log-in
    • Premium Webinars
    • Premium Support
  • Contact
    • Submit Your Grant
    • About us
    • FAQ
    • NGOs.AI
You are here: Home / Hong Kong Government Defends Judicial Independence Amid Criticism from Former Judge

Hong Kong Government Defends Judicial Independence Amid Criticism from Former Judge

Dated: October 23, 2024

Hong Kong’s government has firmly defended the independence of its judiciary following remarks from a former top court judge, who claimed that the courts have become overly partial to the authorities. This statement has sparked a renewed debate about the integrity of the legal system in the region.

Key Takeaways

  • Former judge Lord Jonathan Sumption criticized the judiciary’s bias towards the government.
  • The government responded, asserting that Hong Kong’s courts operate independently.
  • The departure of foreign judges raises concerns about the future of judicial credibility.

Background on the Controversy

In a recent podcast, Lord Jonathan Sumption, a former non-permanent judge of the Court of Final Appeal, expressed his reasons for resigning from the court in June. He stated that recent rulings indicated a troubling trend where the judiciary appeared to favor the government, particularly in high-profile criminal cases.

Sumption pointed to the guilty verdicts in the 47 democrats case, which involved pro-democracy activists accused under the national security law. He argued that these outcomes suggested the judiciary was willing to align itself with Beijing’s interests.

Government’s Response

In response to Sumption’s comments, a government spokesperson labeled his remarks as biased. The spokesperson emphasized that Hong Kong’s judiciary operates independently and that judges make decisions based solely on the evidence presented in court. They asserted that any reasonable observer would recognize the integrity of the judicial process.

The spokesperson further stated:

  • "The courts are not influenced by political pressure from either the central or the Hong Kong government."
  • "The rule of law in Hong Kong remains intact and has not deteriorated."

The Role of Foreign Judges

The controversy surrounding judicial independence is compounded by the recent departures of foreign judges from Hong Kong’s top court. Sumption was one of five foreign judges to leave this year, with concerns growing about the implications for the legal system’s credibility. The government has historically relied on the presence of international judges to bolster confidence in its common law tradition.

In September, another foreign judge, Nicholas Phillips, opted not to extend his appointment, further raising alarms about the future of judicial oversight in the region.

Free Speech and Media Criticism

Sumption also addressed the issue of free speech in Hong Kong, particularly in light of recent sedition verdicts against media figures. He criticized the notion that journalists could not oppose the government without facing legal repercussions, arguing that such a stance undermines the principles of a liberal society.

In response, the government reiterated that media practitioners have a duty to comply with the law. They maintained that as long as journalists operate within legal boundaries, they are free to criticize the government.

Conclusion

The ongoing debate over judicial independence in Hong Kong highlights the tensions between the government and the judiciary, particularly in the context of national security laws and media freedoms. As the situation evolves, the implications for the rule of law and civil liberties in the region remain a critical concern for both local and international observers.

Sources

  • HK defends courts’ independence after ex-judge says judiciary ‘partial’ to gov’t, Hong Kong Free Press HKFP.
author avatar
fundsforngos
See Full Bio

Primary Sidebar

Latest News

Rights Groups Call on EU to Confront Egypt Over Human Rights Abuses at First Summit

Climate Hazards Threaten to Reverse South Asia’s Poverty Gains, Affecting 99% of Poor

Falling Short: Canada’s Challenge in Achieving Poverty Reduction Goals

UNDP Announces Fresh Round of Climate Grants for The Bahamas in UNDP/GEF SGP Expansion

$388 Million Deal Finalized Between Nauru and Australia to Support Refugee Resettlement

$6 Million JPMorgan Chase Initiative Aims to Improve Employment Opportunities in Argentina

Southeast Liberia Enhances Decentralization Through New County Planning Units

Vietnam’s Reform Journey: Why It’s Time for Bold Action

How Digital Government Can Boost Productivity in New Zealand

Clean Energy Solutions and Oxygen Technology Transform Nigerian Healthcare

€22 Million Investment Facility Supports Sierra Leone’s Green Mini-Grid Expansion

European Parliament Calls for Halt to UNRWA Aid Over Alleged Terror Links

WHO Health Response in Afghanistan Expands with Increased EU Humanitarian Funding

Three Czechia Initiatives Receive EU Support to Upgrade Public Services

UN Human Rights Funding at Risk Amid China and Russia Sabotage Claims

Inclusive Digital Economy Gets Boost with Switzerland’s Latest Funding

GSK, ViiV Healthcare Renew Commitment to Global Fund with £6 Million for Local Health Solutions

Rwanda Secures $17.5 Million to Establish AI Scaling Hub, Leading Africa’s AI Innovation

African Fintech Leader Moniepoint Raises $90 Million in Series C, Accelerating Growth

UK Urged to Maintain £1 Billion Global Fund Pledge by NHS and Health Experts

Risk-Knowledge Workshop in Djibouti Advances Early Warning Systems under EW4All

Venezuela Crisis: UN Officials Denounce US Coercive Actions

Addressing Urban Displacement: UN Expert Calls for Rights-Based Approaches

Driving a Resilient Water Future Through Multi-Sector Partnerships

£4.6 Million Funding Announced for Arts and Culture Initiatives Across the UK

Major Funding Secured for 10 Innovative African Climate Projects

Health Experts Warn: Polio Can Still Be Ended Despite 30% Funding Drop

Over €46 Million from EIB to Enhance Energy, Transport, and Municipal Services in Ukraine

Empowering Fact-Checkers: “Digital Detectives” Kicks Off Uzbekistan Training Program

Strengthening Indigenous Economies: Ontario Invests Over $3 Million

Green Transition Fund Expands with UK and ASEAN Clean Energy Initiative

Over One Million People Return to Khartoum as Sudan’s Recovery Remains Fragile

Global Forests See Positive Signs as Deforestation Slows Over Ten Years

DR Congo Faces Surge in Sexual Violence Against Women, UN Reports

Congo Reports Declining Cholera Cases Amid Ongoing Response

Advancing Public Health in Africa: WHO and Africa CDC Deepen Collaboration

World Food Day 2025 in Ghana: Promoting Sustainable Food and Nutrition

IOM Signs MoU with CCCPA to Advance Regional Peace, Security, and Migration Management

Promoting Decent Work: ILO Calls for Socially Just Multilateral Cooperation

Driving Digital Inclusion: Pacific Islands Unite for Connectivity for All

Funds for NGOs
Funds for Companies
Funds for Media
Funds for Individuals
Sample Proposals

Contact us
Submit a Grant
Advertise, Guest Posting & Backlinks
Fight Fraud against NGOs
About us

Terms of Use
Third-Party Links & Ads
Disclaimers
Copyright Policy
General
Privacy Policy

Premium Sign in
Premium Sign up
Premium Customer Support
Premium Terms of Service

©FUNDSFORNGOS LLC.   fundsforngos.org, fundsforngos.ai, and fundsforngospremium.com domains and their subdomains are the property of FUNDSFORNGOS, LLC 140 Broadway 46th Floor, New York, NY 10005, United States.   Unless otherwise specified, this website is not affiliated with the abovementioned organizations. The material provided here is solely for informational purposes and without any warranty. Visitors are advised to use it at their discretion. Read the full disclaimer here. Privacy Policy. Cookie Policy.